EVMath.

EV Battery Degradation Calculator

How much capacity your pack has left, how many miles of range that costs you, and where it lands at 5 and 10 years. Calibrated on Geotab's fleet study of 22,700+ EVs.

Vehicle

Home and workplace Level 2 charging is the rest. A driver who charges at home overnight and road-trips a few times a year sits near 10%; an apartment dweller with no home outlet can be at 100%.

Climate

Hot means most of the year above 77°F — Phoenix, not Chicago. Cold weather cuts range while it is cold but does not measurably age the pack, so it counts as mild here. For the temporary winter hit, use the winter range calculator.

Estimated battery health after 4 years and 48,000 miles

94% of original capacity

0%Likely 91%96%100%

That is 70.1 kWh of the original 75.0 kWh, and roughly 305 mi of rated range instead of 326 mi — about 21 mi lost to degradation.

Range lost so far
21 mi
6% of the 326 mi EPA figure
Equivalent full cycles
147
Odometer ÷ rated range. What cycle aging is charged against.
Reaches 70% capacity
Past 20 yrs
The floor most battery warranties promise. At 12,000 mi/yr.

Projected capacity and range

Holding this car's pace (12,000 miles a year), fast-charge habit, and climate steady.

AgeOdometerCapacityRated range
Today48,00094%91%96%305 mi
At 5 years60,00092%90%95%301 mi
At 10 years120,00087%83%92%284 mi

Where the loss comes from

Calendar aging
3.6 pts

Time alone. Front-loaded, then it flattens — nothing you can do about it.

Mileage (cycle aging)
2.6 pts

147 full cycles of energy through the pack.

DC fast charging
0.3 pts

The extra stress from charging 20% of those miles at a fast charger rather than on Level 2.

Hot climate
0.0 pts

No penalty applied — a mild or cold climate does not age the pack.

An estimate from fleet averages, not a measurement of your pack. Chemistry, thermal design, and how the car was treated before you owned it all move the real number, which is why the result is given as a band. A state-of-health readout from the car or an independent battery test is always better evidence than any model.

What 22,700 real EVs say about degradation

Battery degradation is one of the few EV questions where the anecdotes and the data point in opposite directions. The largest published dataset — Geotab's April 2026 analysis of more than 22,700 vehicles across 21 makes and models — puts average capacity loss at 2.3% per year, which projects to about 81.6% of original capacity at eight years. That is worse than their 2024 figure of 1.8%, and they attribute the change to how EVs are now being charged rather than to the batteries themselves.

The average is the least interesting number in the study. Split by charging behavior, the fleet separates cleanly:

  • Fast-charging in under 12% of sessions: 1.5% a year, projecting to 88% capacity at eight years.
  • Fast-charging often, but mostly under 100 kW: 2.2% a year.
  • More than 40% of sessions above 100 kW: 3.0% a year, projecting to 76% at eight years.

Climate adds another 0.4 percentage points a year for cars living in hot conditions. Those four numbers, plus the shape of the curve, are what the calculator above is built on.

The curve is steep, then flat — which is why year one scares people

Lithium-ion packs do not lose capacity at a constant rate. The first year or two takes a disproportionate bite, then the rate levels off into a long, slow, nearly linear decline. The mechanism is well understood: a passivating film grows on the anode the moment the cell is first charged, and it consumes lithium as it forms. Film growth is diffusion-limited, so it slows down as the film thickens — fast at first, then a crawl.

The practical consequence is that owners misread their own data constantly. A new EV that shows 3% loss after twelve months is not losing 3% a year; it has just finished the expensive part. Extrapolating that first year linearly predicts a dead battery around year twelve, and it is the single most common way people talk themselves out of an EV. The calculator handles this by aging the calendar term as the square root of time, so early loss is front-loaded and the tail flattens the way the fleet data does.

Mileage, by contrast, does behave roughly linearly. Cycle aging tracks energy pushed through the pack, so it scales with the odometer rather than the calendar. The calculator converts your miles into equivalent full cycles — odometer divided by rated range — which is why a 400-mile Lucid and a 250-mile crossover with the same odometer come out differently.

Does DC fast charging actually matter?

Here the evidence genuinely conflicts, and it is worth understanding why before you rearrange your life around it. Geotab's fleet numbers say heavy high-power fast charging roughly doubles the annual rate. Recurrent compared 13,000 Teslas that fast-charged more than 70% of the time against those that did it under 30% of the time and found no statistically significant difference in range degradation.

Both can be true. Geotab's heavy fast-chargers are commercial vehicles that also drive far more miles, so charging habit and cycle count are tangled together in a way the study cannot fully separate. Recurrent's fleet is Teslas — liquid-cooled, aggressively managed, and pre-conditioned before a Supercharger stop. The honest synthesis is that on a modern, actively cooled pack, routine fast charging costs you something measured in single percentage points over the life of the car, not tens. That is the size of the effect this calculator models, and it is why the DC fast-charge slider moves the answer less than internet folklore suggests.

What is not in dispute: fast-charging a hot pack, or repeatedly pushing past 80% on a fast charger where the taper makes it slow anyway, is where the real stress concentrates. Precondition before you plug in, and stop at 80% unless you actually need the miles.

How to slow battery degradation

Ranked by how much the evidence supports them, not by how often they get repeated:

  1. Park in the shade, and out of the heat. Heat is the largest controllable factor in the fleet data — larger than charging habits. A garage, a carport, or a covered spot at work does more for a pack over a decade than any charging discipline. Ambient temperature ages the battery whether the car is moving or not.
  2. Keep the daily charge ceiling at 80–90%, if you have a nickel-based pack. Time spent at a high state of charge accelerates aging. If your car has an LFP pack, do the opposite and charge to 100% regularly — the battery management system needs the full charge to calibrate. Your owner's manual says which chemistry you have.
  3. Do most of your charging on Level 2 at home. The effect is smaller than you have been told, but it is not zero, and home charging is cheaper anyway. If you are weighing the install, the home charger ROI calculator prices it out — battery longevity is a bonus, not the reason.
  4. Precondition before fast charging. A cold pack accepts a fast charge badly and a hot one accepts it destructively. Navigating to a fast charger in-car triggers preconditioning on most modern EVs, and it is the single most useful button you are probably not pressing.
  5. Avoid leaving the car at 100% or near 0% for days. Storage at either extreme is harder on cells than driving through the same range. Before a long trip away from the car, leave it somewhere near half charge.
  6. Stop worrying about the rest. Hard acceleration, regenerative braking, and the occasional 100% charge before a road trip are not meaningfully aging your pack. The battery management system is doing more to protect the cells than you can.

What your warranty actually promises

Federal law requires an EV battery warranty of at least eight years or 100,000 miles. Most manufacturers pair that term with a capacity floor — commonly 70% of original capacity — below which they will repair or replace the pack. Read the specific language: the term and the capacity threshold are separate promises, and a few brands warrant the term without committing to a number.

California wrote stricter durability rules into its Advanced Clean Cars II regulation for 2026-and-later models, requiring 70% of range be retained out to 10 years or 150,000 miles. Congress disapproved the federal waiver those rules depend on in June 2025 and the matter is in litigation, so treat California-specific coverage as unsettled rather than guaranteed, and check the warranty booklet for the car in front of you.

In practice the warranty is a backstop that almost nobody uses for gradual wear. Across all model years, Recurrent finds fewer than 4% of EVs have had a battery replaced; among 2022-and-newer vehicles it is roughly 0.3%. The replacements that do happen are overwhelmingly manufacturing defects surfacing early, not packs that slowly wore out.

Estimates only. Degradation rates and the shape of the aging curve are calibrated on Geotab's 2026 battery health study (22,700+ vehicles, 21 makes and models, published April 2026) and Recurrent's fast-charging analysis (13,000 Teslas). Battery capacity and EPA range figures come from fueleconomy.gov and manufacturer specifications, 2025–2026 model years. California durability rules: CARB Advanced Clean Cars II. Battery data changes as fleets age — verify against the current study year before relying on these figures.

Frequently asked questions

How much does an EV battery degrade per year?+

About 2.3% a year on average, according to Geotab's 2026 analysis of more than 22,700 EVs across 21 makes and models — up from the 1.8% they measured in 2024, a rise they attribute to growing use of high-power DC fast charging. The average hides a wide spread: vehicles that fast-charged in fewer than 12% of sessions lost 1.5% a year, while those with more than 40% of sessions above 100 kW lost 3.0% a year. The rate is also not constant. Loss is fastest in the first year or two, then flattens into a long, slow decline, so a car that dropped 3% in year one is not on track to drop 30% by year ten.

Do EV batteries lose range over time?+

Yes, and roughly in proportion to capacity: a pack holding 90% of its original energy will go about 90% as far under identical conditions. Two things confuse this. First, the range number on the dash is an estimate the car recalculates, and manufacturers keep a hidden buffer at the bottom of the pack, so displayed range often falls more slowly than actual capacity for the first few years. Second, most range loss drivers notice is not degradation at all — it is winter. A pack that is 95% healthy still shows a 20–30% range drop at 20°F, and it comes back in spring.

Does DC fast charging ruin your EV battery?+

The two largest real-world datasets disagree, which is itself the answer: whatever the effect is, it is small enough to be hard to see. Geotab's fleet data finds heavy high-power fast-charging roughly doubles the annual degradation rate. Recurrent compared 13,000 Teslas that fast-charged more than 70% of the time against those doing it less than 30% of the time and found no statistically significant difference in range loss. The gap is partly that Geotab's heavy fast-chargers also drive far more, so mileage and charging habit are tangled together in their numbers. On a modern liquid-cooled pack with active thermal management, fast charging as your normal routine is a modest cost, not a catastrophe. Fast charging a hot pack, or fast-charging repeatedly above 80%, is where the real stress lives.

How long before an EV battery needs replacing?+

Far longer than most people expect, and rarely because of gradual capacity loss. Manufacturers treat 70% of original capacity as the replacement threshold under warranty, and at typical mileage a modern pack takes well over a decade to get there. Recurrent's replacement data tells the story better than any projection: across all model years fewer than 4% of EVs have had a battery replaced, and among 2022-and-newer vehicles it is about 0.3%. Most replacements are manufacturing defects caught under warranty, not worn-out packs.

Should I charge to 80% or 100%?+

It depends on the chemistry, which is why blanket advice is wrong so often. Nickel-based packs (NMC, NCA — most long-range EVs) age faster when they sit at a high state of charge, so an 80–90% daily ceiling is worth the small inconvenience, with 100% reserved for trips. Lithium iron phosphate packs (LFP — many standard-range models) are the opposite case: manufacturers ask you to charge to 100% regularly, because the flat LFP voltage curve leaves the battery management system unable to calibrate its charge estimate otherwise. Check your owner's manual for which one you have; the guidance in it is chemistry-specific and it is not marketing.

Does heat or cold damage an EV battery more?+

Heat, and it is not close. Geotab found vehicles in hot conditions degrade about 0.4 percentage points per year faster than those in mild climates. High ambient temperature accelerates the side reactions that permanently consume lithium, and it does so whether you are driving or parked. Cold is the opposite: it temporarily slows the chemistry, which cuts range and charging speed while it is cold, but it does not measurably age the pack. A Minnesota EV loses a third of its range every January and ages more slowly than a Phoenix one that never loses a mile.

How can I check my EV's actual battery health?+

Any estimate from age and mileage — including this one — is a fleet average, not a measurement. Better evidence, in ascending order: the vehicle's own service menu or app, where some manufacturers expose a state-of-health figure; an OBD-II dongle with a model-specific app, which reads the battery management system directly; and a standardized third-party test that runs a controlled discharge. If you are buying a used EV, a battery health report is the single most valuable piece of paper in the transaction, and it is worth paying for.

Keep going